WIFI would be a nice perk for the iPod, but if it were an essential Apple would have done it by now. Microsoft’s implementation of wireless isn’t enough of a differentiator. But by the end of 2008, when they have a solid Zune version two in play for some time, I guarantee they’ll be a firm #2 in the market. Nothing near Apple, but ahead of Samsung, Creative, et. al.

The Zune will offer versatility, where the iPod offers specialization. Look at Apple’s “iTV” device compared to Windows Media Center. Two completely different approaches to technology.

http://www.gizmodo.com/gadgets/portable-media/touchscreen-ipod-in-december-zune-slamdunked-208418.php

Second, I JUST sold out and purchased an 80gb 5.5 generation iPod, and I’m pissed after reading this. That being said, I must admit that all in all I love the device and find it “slick”. I am still ashamed that I sold out, but 80gb is 80gb.

iTunes is a joke for a media pirate like me. I’m never buying any music, so why do I need an inferior tool to load music on my device? For you podheads out there, try coughing up $25 and using Redchair Software’s Anapod Explorer. Straight forward interface at a roughly 2mb download (iTunes is getting towards 40mb).

Finally, the Zune will be a total catastrophe in my opinion. This is a saturated market with a clear leader. Unless there is a clear differentiator, it will be impossible to top. The classic example being Microsoft’s own operating system. There are fledgling competitors here and there, but Windows is not going away any time soon.

I think wi-fi is a step in the right direction, but not enough. Eventually Steve will catch on and will add wi-fi and bluetooth, but realizes that he’s selling a pantload of these things right now without them. I honestly don’t understand the timing on Microsoft’s entry into this market without a clearly superior product, or at least an idea that will change the market with some significance.

And yes, I want a Zune too.

But to discount it I think is disingenuous. Even if the wireless connection only facilitates syncing and streaming to an Airport- users have been begging for it for years.

Microsoft’s 3 days 3 plays model isn’t great, but the point is sharing without wires. iTunes already automatically looks for additional iTunes libraries on your network- why not let iPods search too?

I think you’re right, it’s been designed for years, but battery life, and unnecessary complexity means it doesn’t leave Cupertino. Apple is making methodical moves with the iPod, and for good reason- they’re the 800lb. gorilla in the DAP world. But Microsoft doesn’t enter a market frivolously, and this Zune isn’t real competition, but v.3 may be.